Janos v Chama Motors Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 238

Handley AJA (Giles JA agreeing):

23. …It is well established that service of an appropriate pleading can be an unequivocal election to terminate or rescind a contract: Clough v London & North Western Railway Co (1871) LR Ex 26, 36; Banque Belge v Hambrouk [1921] 1 KB 321 CA, 332; Nicholas v Thompson [1924] VLR 554; Lakshmijit v Sherani [1974] AC 605, 616.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: